Streamlining Investigations under GST without conflict of interest

By -


The Ministry of Finance, Government of India, on 30th March 2024 has issued comprehensive guidelines vide Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) for CGST field formations. 

The 6 important key takeaways from the circular are:-

1.Responsibilities of (Pr.) Commissioner:

Under the purview of their allocated jurisdiction, Principal Commissioners are entrusted with the task of overseeing the development, approval, and execution of intelligence, searches, and investigations.

Additionally, they are responsible for coordinating with divisional formations and ensuring timely action on investigative matters.

2. Approval Process for Investigation Initiation:

Investigations must receive explicit approval from the (Pr.) Commissioner before initiation, except in specific scenarios outlined by the CBIC.

Situations necessitating prior written approval from the zonal Chief Commissioner include

a. matters involving novel interpretations,

b. large industrial houses, 

c. sensitive issues, or 

d. those under consideration by the GST Council.

3. Coordination and Information Sharing:

(Pr.) Commissioners must verify, if any ongoing inquiries pertain to the same subject matter or taxpayer across different investigating offices.

Collaboration with other investigating offices is encouraged to consolidate subject matters under one unit, fostering efficiency and avoiding redundant efforts.

4. Collaboration with DGGI:

Instances where the jurisdiction of the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) intersects with CGST zones necessitate cooperation and coordination.

The Principal Commissioner may refer relevant matters to the Principal DG, DGGI for further action, ensuring seamless collaboration between the entities.

5. Communication requirements with Taxpayers:

Instead of immediately summoning listed companies, PSUs, corporations, or government departments, officials are encouraged to initiate communication through official letters as first line of action. 

These letters should articulate the rationale behind the investigation, cite relevant legal provisions, and specify a reasonable timeframe for response.

6. Timely Conclusion of Investigations:

The CBIC emphasizes the need for investigations to be concluded within one year, with no undue delays in issuing Show Cause Notices (SCNs) or closure reports.

Grievances related to ongoing investigations can be addressed to the designated Grievance Officer, typically the Additional/Joint Commissioner.

Well.....

This CBIC’s guidelines are a progressive significant step representing a path  towards fostering transparency, accountability, and efficiency in the investigation process. Also, by delineating clear protocols, promoting inter-agency coordination, and prioritizing timely resolutions, these guidelines endeavor to create a conducive environment for businesses while upholding the tenets of tax compliance and enforcement without conflict of interest or compromise on investigation on tax evasions.


R. SRIVATSAN

NACIN, Chennai

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mismatches between GSTR 2A vs 3B- Things to be considered before you respond to GST Notices

By -
Image
  Among the discrepancies for which notices are issued by department, mismatches between GSTR 2A vs 3B tops it all. Objective of this blog is to highlight aspects that are relevant while responding to the GST Notices especially for FY 2017-18 & 2018-19. Deadline to issue the order under sec 73(10) for FY 2018-19 is 30th April 2024, thus department is rushing orders in their favor, if you fail to highlight appropriate aspects in your reply to notices issued under sec 73/74. Introduction and relevance of GSTR 2A:   The FORM GSTR 2A was not established with a defined purpose for financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19.  Provision in respect of limit of ITC on basis of GSTR-2A was introduced only on 9-10-2019, but system was not fully established for some time.   Hence, for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19, insistence of matching of GSTR-2A and Input Tax Credit availed by recipient was not legitimized.  Provisions applicable from 9-10-2019 till 1-1-2022:   The ITC availed by recipie
Read more

Renting of residential dwelling unit to a registered person

By -
Image
The irony is quite recently in the month of May 2022,  The Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra in case of  M/S. KASTURI & SONS LTD, AAR held that GST applicability is not decided by the nature of the property but by the purpose for which it is used. Thus, GST exemption is allowed to applicant. You can read our earlier blog by clicking this hyperlink  further.  The ruling given by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling, Goods and Services Tax, in the case of IN RE: M/S. BORBHETA ESTATE PVT. LTD was referred in the above ruling that the Applicant's service of renting/leasing out the dwelling units for residential purpose was, exempt under Si No. 12 of the Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended from time to time and the Applicant, therefore, was not liable to pay tax on supply of such service. That said effective 18th July 2022, the following amendments were made to effect GST on rental income derived from residential units when rente
Read more

Classification of Services cannot be the subject matter of writ petition

By -
Image
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of KPR Concrete Readymix v. State Tax Officer [Writ Petition Nos. 35949, 35953 of 2023 January 08, 2024] held that the dispute which revolves around the classification of services, does not fall within the limited category of cases in which a Show Cause Notice may be assailed in proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.  The issue involved in the dispute is that KPR Concrete Readymix (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in providing transportation services to their customers. The Petitioner classified its services under the Service Accounting Code (“SAC”) 996511 - Road transport services of Goods and paid a GST rate of 12% on such services.  The State Tax Officer (“the Respondent”) issued a notice in FORM DRC-01A, alleging short payment of tax on the services provided by the Petitioner which should be classified under SAC 996601-Rental services of road vehicles including buses, coaches, cars, trucks and other motor vehicles, with or w
Read more