Administration of Covid vaccine by hospitals would not qualify as a ‘healthcare service’

By -

Interestingly a multi-specialty hospital chain, has not succeeded in its appeal that administration of Covid vaccine by hospitals would qualify as a ‘healthcare service’ and be exempt from GST.



The Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings (AAAR)-Maharastra upheld an original ruling, against which an appeal had been filed and reconfirmed GST applicability at 5%.

Looking back, GST Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR), in March 2022 had held that administration of the Covid vaccine by hospitals is a ‘composite supply’, where principal supply is the sale of vaccine and auxiliary supply is the service of administering the vaccine. 

Thus, the total transaction would be taxable at the rate applicable to the principal supply, which is 5%.

This led to the hospital chain filing an appeal with the AAAR. It contended that the AAR bench had erred in interpreting the basic fact of the case that an individual is visiting the hospital not to buy the vaccine but to get ‘served’ through vaccination.

The AAAR pointed to a clarification issued by the department of health and family welfare. The price of the vaccine, the GST component on the vaccine, the service charge that can be collected per dose by the vaccination centre were also specified by the government.

Given the above, the AAAR bench in their order stated, The vaccine is the ‘goods’ component in the entire transaction, accompanied by administration of the vaccine as the ‘service’ component the principal supply and therefore liable for GST

Well....come what may.....


No immunity from GST


SRIVATSAN.R.

GST - Chennai

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mismatches between GSTR 2A vs 3B- Things to be considered before you respond to GST Notices

By -
Image
  Among the discrepancies for which notices are issued by department, mismatches between GSTR 2A vs 3B tops it all. Objective of this blog is to highlight aspects that are relevant while responding to the GST Notices especially for FY 2017-18 & 2018-19. Deadline to issue the order under sec 73(10) for FY 2018-19 is 30th April 2024, thus department is rushing orders in their favor, if you fail to highlight appropriate aspects in your reply to notices issued under sec 73/74. Introduction and relevance of GSTR 2A:   The FORM GSTR 2A was not established with a defined purpose for financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19.  Provision in respect of limit of ITC on basis of GSTR-2A was introduced only on 9-10-2019, but system was not fully established for some time.   Hence, for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19, insistence of matching of GSTR-2A and Input Tax Credit availed by recipient was not legitimized.  Provisions applicable from 9-10-2019 till 1-1-2022:   The ITC availed by recipie
Read more

Tracing the impact of Circular No. 170/02/2022 to GSTR-9 for FY 2022-23

By -
Image
 The purpose this circular No.170/02/2022 was to clarify mandatory furnishing of correct and proper information of inter-State supplies and amount of ineligible/blocked Input Tax Credit and reversal thereof in return in FORM GSTR-3B and statement in FORM GSTR-1. The category of changes suggested are broadly in lines of : Changes relating to supplies through E-commerce operators Changes relating to reporting of inter-state supplies Changes relating to ITC Over this blog, we attempt to trace the changes relating to ITC on to respective rows of GSTR 9 for FY 2022-23. Clarification as such on these lines not available elsewhere, so its to be understood as our  personal view only for any wider consumption for application as such. Vide this  circular No.170/02/2022  para 4, the following key points were instructed: Presently, Table 4A of GSTR-3B contains the details of various ITC being claimed. Table 4B contains details of various reversals. Table 4C, i.e. the difference between 4A and 4B
Read more

No GST On Subsidised Deduction made From Employees Availing Food in Factory Or Corporate Office: Gujarat AAR

By -
Image
The Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that GST is not payable on the subsidised deduction made by the applicant from the employees who are availing food in the factory/corporate office. The applicant is in the business of manufacturing, supplying, and distributing various pharmaceutical products. The applicant has 1,200 employees in their factory and is registered under the provisions of the Factories Act of 1948. The applicant is required to comply with all the obligations and responsibilities cast under the provisions of the Factories Act 1948. The employees are charged only for the days on which the employee has punched his ID card, and an amount equal to a predetermined percentage shall be deducted from the salary payable to the respective employee. The deduction was credited to the expense account in which the canteen expense was booked while the full amount of the invoice issued by the Canteen Service provider was booked as an expense in the applicant's prof
Read more